<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sustainable Mothering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sustainablemothering.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com</link>
	<description>Mothering as a Human and Civil Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law by Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/05/10/curb-your-enthusiasm-about-the-new-federal-workplace-pumping-law/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=787#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. <img src='http://www.sustainablemothering.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law by Sarah Miner</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/05/10/curb-your-enthusiasm-about-the-new-federal-workplace-pumping-law/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Miner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=787#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Jake,
Thanks for breaking this complicated, convoluted new development in pumping at work into easily digested, bite-size chunks.  It is a great resource for those helping mothers (and mothers themselves) to understand what the options are for managing the needs of their baby while working outside the home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake,<br />
Thanks for breaking this complicated, convoluted new development in pumping at work into easily digested, bite-size chunks.  It is a great resource for those helping mothers (and mothers themselves) to understand what the options are for managing the needs of their baby while working outside the home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law by Steve Cipolla</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/23/u-s-department-of-labor-issues-fct-sheet-on-workplace-pumping-la/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cipolla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=1009#comment-880</guid>
		<description>Jake&#039;s early, sobering analysis of this law was spot-on. The &quot;fact&quot; sheet only confirms what we know from Jake&#039;s piece, (see link above) &quot;Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law,&quot; which I strongly urge everyone to re-read: to wit, that statute, regardless of what it may or may not provide in the way of actual enforcement mechanisms for working Moms who want to pump, does NOT provide anything to women who are exempt from the overtime provisions of the FSLA.  E.g., Congress deliberately put this provision in  a Depression-era statute that only applies to hourly employees, so the workplace pumping provision within it only applies to women who work for an hourly wage, and are entitled to overtime, work for employers with over 50 employees (hmm, does that include full time independent contractors?) and for whom compliance would not constitute an undue hardship.   

There is nothing in the fact sheet or the link to which the fact sheet refers you for &quot;more information&quot; that illuminates any of the critical questions posed about remedies and enforcement in Jake&#039;s &quot;Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law.&quot;   

There are significant legal questions about how to enforce this law against non-compliant employers, whether a women has to suffer a termination for insisting to pump in order to bring suit for reinstatement?  What is the plan at DOL for enforcement? Is this fact sheet simply a sop to satisfy people who, undoubtedly as a result of commentary like Jake&#039;s, were raising questions with their local Congressperson.  Fact sheets are fine, but they are not law, regulation, or even guidance. 

Jake was right about this statute when it was first publicized, because over the years she has developed not only a remarkable expertise in state laws regarding breastfeeding and workplace pumping, but also because she has a keen and skeptical approach to any law or bill that appears to be too good to be true.  The language of this bill was designed to fool people.  It is any lawyer&#039;s most valuable skill in interpreting legislation to be able to identify what is worthless in new legislation.  

At the end of &quot;To Kill a Mockingbird&quot; the nice lady, Maudy, across the street from Atticus Finch&#039;s house tells Jem and Scout that their father is one of those people who do our unpleasant tasks for us?   (If you don&#039;t know the movie, go rent it now and watch it with the kids!) And, you know the saying that there are two things you don&#039;t want to watch being made, sausage and legislation?   Well, Jake is one of those people we rely upon to break the shrinkwrap and dissect the legislative sausage for us.  It is always disgusting, and frequently illuminating.  I am a practicing litigation attorney, and rely on other lawyers to do this for me.   It&#039;s that onerous!   

This not a half full situation, as someone said in a prior post.   For Moms who are covered by the statute,the federal glass currently is bone dry.  Seek state remedies, and don&#039;t let any state lawmaker tell you that there is a federal law that covers the issue.  The federal law is crap.  And, if you read Jake&#039;s posts, the fact sheet and the one page of law that we are talking about, the conclusion that it is crap is obvious.    

Whether the DOL finds a Constitutional way to put teeth in it, remains to be seen, but the fact sheet does not provide a basis for feeling optimistic about future vigorous enforcement, if such a thing is even permissible under this provision of the FSLA at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake&#8217;s early, sobering analysis of this law was spot-on. The &#8220;fact&#8221; sheet only confirms what we know from Jake&#8217;s piece, (see link above) &#8220;Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law,&#8221; which I strongly urge everyone to re-read: to wit, that statute, regardless of what it may or may not provide in the way of actual enforcement mechanisms for working Moms who want to pump, does NOT provide anything to women who are exempt from the overtime provisions of the FSLA.  E.g., Congress deliberately put this provision in  a Depression-era statute that only applies to hourly employees, so the workplace pumping provision within it only applies to women who work for an hourly wage, and are entitled to overtime, work for employers with over 50 employees (hmm, does that include full time independent contractors?) and for whom compliance would not constitute an undue hardship.   </p>
<p>There is nothing in the fact sheet or the link to which the fact sheet refers you for &#8220;more information&#8221; that illuminates any of the critical questions posed about remedies and enforcement in Jake&#8217;s &#8220;Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law.&#8221;   </p>
<p>There are significant legal questions about how to enforce this law against non-compliant employers, whether a women has to suffer a termination for insisting to pump in order to bring suit for reinstatement?  What is the plan at DOL for enforcement? Is this fact sheet simply a sop to satisfy people who, undoubtedly as a result of commentary like Jake&#8217;s, were raising questions with their local Congressperson.  Fact sheets are fine, but they are not law, regulation, or even guidance. </p>
<p>Jake was right about this statute when it was first publicized, because over the years she has developed not only a remarkable expertise in state laws regarding breastfeeding and workplace pumping, but also because she has a keen and skeptical approach to any law or bill that appears to be too good to be true.  The language of this bill was designed to fool people.  It is any lawyer&#8217;s most valuable skill in interpreting legislation to be able to identify what is worthless in new legislation.  </p>
<p>At the end of &#8220;To Kill a Mockingbird&#8221; the nice lady, Maudy, across the street from Atticus Finch&#8217;s house tells Jem and Scout that their father is one of those people who do our unpleasant tasks for us?   (If you don&#8217;t know the movie, go rent it now and watch it with the kids!) And, you know the saying that there are two things you don&#8217;t want to watch being made, sausage and legislation?   Well, Jake is one of those people we rely upon to break the shrinkwrap and dissect the legislative sausage for us.  It is always disgusting, and frequently illuminating.  I am a practicing litigation attorney, and rely on other lawyers to do this for me.   It&#8217;s that onerous!   </p>
<p>This not a half full situation, as someone said in a prior post.   For Moms who are covered by the statute,the federal glass currently is bone dry.  Seek state remedies, and don&#8217;t let any state lawmaker tell you that there is a federal law that covers the issue.  The federal law is crap.  And, if you read Jake&#8217;s posts, the fact sheet and the one page of law that we are talking about, the conclusion that it is crap is obvious.    </p>
<p>Whether the DOL finds a Constitutional way to put teeth in it, remains to be seen, but the fact sheet does not provide a basis for feeling optimistic about future vigorous enforcement, if such a thing is even permissible under this provision of the FSLA at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law by Tweets that mention U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law &#124; Sustainable Mothering -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/23/u-s-department-of-labor-issues-fct-sheet-on-workplace-pumping-la/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law &#124; Sustainable Mothering -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=1009#comment-873</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jake Aryeh Marcus, Scotti Weintraub. Scotti Weintraub said: RT @JakeAryehMarcus: New blog post: U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law http://bit.ly/9BdGnt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jake Aryeh Marcus, Scotti Weintraub. Scotti Weintraub said: RT @JakeAryehMarcus: New blog post: U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law <a href="http://bit.ly/9BdGnt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9BdGnt</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curb Your Enthusiasm About the New Federal Workplace Pumping Law by U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law &#124; Sustainable Mothering</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/05/10/curb-your-enthusiasm-about-the-new-federal-workplace-pumping-law/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Department of Labor Issues Fact Sheet on New Workplace Pumping Law &#124; Sustainable Mothering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=787#comment-872</guid>
		<description>[...] law requiring certain employers to give unpaid pump breaks to certain employees (and my advice to Curb Your Enthusiasm), the U.S. Department of Labor has issued a Fact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law requiring certain employers to give unpaid pump breaks to certain employees (and my advice to Curb Your Enthusiasm), the U.S. Department of Labor has issued a Fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? by Tweets that mention Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? &#124; Sustainable Mothering -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/20/could-your-six-year-old-be-arrested-handcuffed-and-shackled-in-school/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? &#124; Sustainable Mothering -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=974#comment-868</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by phdinparenting, Judy Masucci and Jake Aryeh Marcus, Kimber Williams. Kimber Williams said: RT @MommyNews: RT @JakeAryehMarcus Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? http://bit.ly/dcGf8y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by phdinparenting, Judy Masucci and Jake Aryeh Marcus, Kimber Williams. Kimber Williams said: RT @MommyNews: RT @JakeAryehMarcus Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? <a href="http://bit.ly/dcGf8y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dcGf8y</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? by Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/20/could-your-six-year-old-be-arrested-handcuffed-and-shackled-in-school/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=974#comment-867</guid>
		<description>When I was in second grade (many, many years ago), my teacher tied a classmate to her chair with a jump rope. I really thought things would be better by now, but it seems that they are worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in second grade (many, many years ago), my teacher tied a classmate to her chair with a jump rope. I really thought things would be better by now, but it seems that they are worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? by Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/20/could-your-six-year-old-be-arrested-handcuffed-and-shackled-in-school/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=974#comment-866</guid>
		<description>On this point, there may not be much difference between the U.S. and Iran and many parents don&#039;t know it. While I homeschool my sons now, two of my boys went to school while corporal punishment was still legal in schools in my state. I had no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this point, there may not be much difference between the U.S. and Iran and many parents don&#8217;t know it. While I homeschool my sons now, two of my boys went to school while corporal punishment was still legal in schools in my state. I had no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? by Judy@MommyNewsBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/20/could-your-six-year-old-be-arrested-handcuffed-and-shackled-in-school/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy@MommyNewsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=974#comment-865</guid>
		<description>I have never heard of anything so absurd!  Are we barbarians?  This is crazy for any child to be treated this way - let alone a 6 year old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard of anything so absurd!  Are we barbarians?  This is crazy for any child to be treated this way &#8211; let alone a 6 year old!<br />
<span class="cluv">Judy@MommyNewsBlog&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://mommynewsblog.com/suggestions-for-starting-a-breastfeeding-support-bag-project/">Suggestions For Starting a Breastfeeding Support Bag Project</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.sustainablemothering.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Could Your Six Year Old Be Arrested, Handcuffed and Shackled in School? by Lisa RM</title>
		<link>http://www.sustainablemothering.com/2010/07/20/could-your-six-year-old-be-arrested-handcuffed-and-shackled-in-school/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainablemothering.com/?p=974#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Whoa.  I can understand maybe restraining kids in the middle of a fight (like holding onto the child&#039;s waist or arms to stop the altercation) but SHACKLING?!  A six year old?!  Is this the US or Iran?  I&#039;m actually kind of scared now for when my son goes to school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa.  I can understand maybe restraining kids in the middle of a fight (like holding onto the child&#8217;s waist or arms to stop the altercation) but SHACKLING?!  A six year old?!  Is this the US or Iran?  I&#8217;m actually kind of scared now for when my son goes to school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
